Skip to content

Financing Climate Mitigation and Adaptation

DOI https://doi.org/10.21552/cclr/2017/4/7

Charles Di Leva


The promise of climate finance has been a fundamental challenge within the UNFCCC regime since its inception. While the Parties agreed on a Financial Mechanism, and that developed countries would provide ‘new and additional resources’, developed and developing countries have often been at odds over this commitment, and more fundamentally, what constitutes ‘climate finance’, how much should be provided, and whether there has been adequate balance between mitigation and adaptation. Just when Paris seemed to show signs of momentum toward climate finance targets, the new US Administration reversed course on the prior administration’s commitment to the Green Climate Fund. This article looks at the possible impacts of the US decision on climate finance, including the efforts of other countries and international organizations to address the potential funding gap.

Charles E Di Leva is the World Bank’s former Chief Counsel of Environmental and International Law, and is currently an Adjunct Professor of International Trade and Sustainable Development at George Washington University Law School, and of International Financial Institutions and International Law at the American University Washington College of Law. He is also a Visiting Scholar at the Environmental Law Institute, a member of the American College of Environmental Lawyers, and the American Society of International Law. For correspondence: <mailto:charlesdileva@gmail.com>

Share


Lx-Number Search

A
|
(e.g. A | 000123 | 01)

Export Citation