In the Market journal article Jørund Buen Carbon & Climate Law Review, Volume 4 (2010), Issue 3, Page 291 - 293 Clarifications recently published by the CDM Executive Board (EB) and the Joint Implementation Supervisory Committee (JISC) regarding the period beyond 2012 brush aside any doubts about the future role of the CDM, and also provide more clarity on the post-2012 role of JI. The clarifications came as something of a surprise following an earlier analysis issued by the UNFCCC Secretariat on the implications of a gap between commitment periods that had signaled a much more uncertain future for both. The message this time is very clear: all components of the CDM will continue to be operational post-2012, regardless of whether Annex I countries inscribe post-2012 emission limitation and reduction targets in the Kyoto Protocol or not.
Climate Litigation and Nationally Determined Contributions: Above and Beyond Accountability Jorge Alejandro Carrillo Bañuelos
The Impact of Climate Change on Human Rights and the Legal Obligations of States to Protect Them – A Comparative Jurisdictional Analysis Zunaida Moosa Wadiwala