Supporting Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions through the Green Climate Fund: Governance Capacities and Challenges journal article Mathias Fridahl, Prabhat Upadhyaya, Björn-Ola Linnér Carbon & Climate Law Review, Volume 8 (2014), Issue 4, Page 257 - 269 The Green Climate Fund (GCF) is emerging as an innovative multilateral climate finance institution to support adaptation and mitigation, including Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions (NAMAs), in developing countries. Using perspectives from the international environmental law and governance literature, this article identifies a crucial governance challenge facing NAMA support, a challenge related to states’ obligations vis-à-vis the GCF, and analyses the delegation and precision of governance capacities granted to the GCF Board to address that challenge. The GCF must engage in a balancing act. On the one hand, the absence of distinct criteria for deciding on NAMA support may prompt potential funders to pursue bilateral or other channels for support. On the other hand, too rigid a criteria may reduce developing countries’ submission and “ownership” of NAMA proposals. Both aspects potentially challenge the effectiveness of the GCF’s NAMA support. The Board has been granted a high governance capacity, relative to its mother institution the UNFCCC, to efficiently address this balancing act. Inability to exercise this capacity, however, may result in the establishment of a strong but empty shell for NAMA support.
Climate Litigation and Nationally Determined Contributions: Above and Beyond Accountability Jorge Alejandro Carrillo Bañuelos
The Impact of Climate Change on Human Rights and the Legal Obligations of States to Protect Them – A Comparative Jurisdictional Analysis Zunaida Moosa Wadiwala